Prosperous Justice Party

Strongly agree

No, more research is needed to measure the long term effects of fracking

Given the PKS's focus on social justice and welfare, it is likely that they would support more research into the long-term effects of fracking before making a decision. This aligns with their cautious approach to policy-making. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No, we should pursue more sustainable energy resources instead

The PKS has shown interest in sustainable development and the welfare of the community. Therefore, it is likely that they would support the pursuit of more sustainable energy resources instead of hydraulic fracking. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No

While the PKS has not explicitly stated its position on fracking, it is likely that they would lean towards opposition due to potential environmental and health risks. However, without a clear stance, the score remains moderate. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

Yes, but increase oversight

The PKS might agree with the idea of increased oversight if hydraulic fracking were to be implemented, given their focus on justice and welfare. However, without a clear stance on fracking itself, the score remains slightly positive. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly disagree

Yes, but not in heavily populated areas

While the PKS might agree with the idea of limiting fracking in heavily populated areas due to potential health risks, they have not explicitly supported fracking in any form. Therefore, the score remains slightly negative. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes

The Prosperous Justice Party (PKS) in Indonesia is known for its conservative Islamic values and has not explicitly supported hydraulic fracking. The party's stance on environmental issues is not clear, but considering its focus on social justice, it is likely that they would have concerns about the environmental and health risks associated with fracking. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.