Try the political quiz

0 Reply

 @8XMPWNTProsperous Justiceanswered…2yrs2Y

No, prefer to pursue cross subsidizing program to ensure every people received decent basic necessities

 @8SR5XZHanswered…3yrs3Y

Yes, but they need to give an amount that isn’t too much so that the people will stop working but just enough to support them.

 @ISIDEWITHasked…4mos4MO

How would the knowledge that everyone in your school receives a small income change the dynamics of your friendships and collaborations?

 @ISIDEWITHasked…4mos4MO

Reflect on the roles of tradition and adaptability in society: would a guaranteed income represent progress or dependence?

 @ISIDEWITHasked…4mos4MO

Could the promise of a universal basic income encourage innovation and risk-taking among young people, and if so, how?

 @ISIDEWITHasked…4mos4MO

How fair is it to fund a universal income with taxes, and would it affect your view on how hard you should work or how much you should earn?

 @ISIDEWITHasked…4mos4MO

Do you believe humans are motivated to work solely by money, or do we seek deeper meaning in our careers?

 @ISIDEWITHasked…4mos4MO

Without the fear of financial instability, what dreams or projects would you pursue that you might not feel able to currently?

 @ISIDEWITHasked…4mos4MO

Imagine a society where your basic needs were met without working; what positive and negative effects do you think this might have on your community?

 @ISIDEWITHasked…4mos4MO

If you were guaranteed a basic income, how would you spend your additional free time or would it change at all?

 @ISIDEWITHasked…4mos4MO

Can a monthly sum of money improve happiness and if so, would it change the aspects of life you currently find most fulfilling?

 @ISIDEWITHasked…4mos4MO

How might receiving a steady, no-strings-attached income impact your ambitions and career choices?

 @9H3TVFYanswered…4mos4MO

The foods and supporters of costs of living organisms most people needs assistance

  Deletedanswered…1yr1Y

Yes, in the form of a Negative Income Tax to cover basic necessities including food and housing

  Deletedanswered…1yr1Y

 @DengekiMatsuko from California answered…2yrs2Y

Yes, but for those who are out of work and are actively looking for a job

 @94267X2 from Colorado answered…2yrs2Y

 @9425J2G from Florida answered…2yrs2Y

With an income cutoff - Stop making the rich richer and the poor stuck.

 @93ZQDBJ from California answered…2yrs2Y

UBI should be offered to people in poverty to increase the middle class and given as a temporary option to those who cannot support themselves.

 @93VGL9L from Minnesota answered…2yrs2Y

Yes, everyone should receive an income to cover basic necessities including food and housing, but only on a temporary/test basis. This way the government can get a baseline sense of the funding required to reduce food/housing disparity and can gauge the success of the program prior to deciding whether or not to implement long term.

 @57QKT6Tanswered…2yrs2Y

Yes, we are rapidly coming to a point in time where automation will make it difficult for everyone to find a job, especially those with disabilities or other factors preventing them from "moving up" in the world; all citizens should have their basic needs met with the option of working to gain more money for extras.

 @92JXK3J from New York answered…2yrs2Y

No. I support a National Dividend and Social Credit program as proposed by economist CH Douglas. I think it could solve the problems of UBI but also provide some of the positives of the UBI.

  Deletedanswered…2yrs2Y

No, universal basic income would cause inflation and no net change in people's quality of life.

 @EthanHars from Iowa answered…2yrs2Y

 @93CS3TH from Texas answered…2yrs2Y

We should wait to consider a program like this until more data is avaliable.

 @93BDMP6 from California answered…2yrs2Y

Yes, if all other forms of welfare are eliminated and there are no income phase-outs

 @Panagioti999 from Michigan answered…2yrs2Y

No, expand other social welfare programs like Medicare/Medicaid, food stamps, and housing assistance instead. UBI is a back door to austerity.

 @934R57Ganswered…2yrs2Y

Yes, as the automation takes over jobs, the humans will need to live.

 @9324D72 from Arkansas answered…2yrs2Y

No, the government should provide housing, food, and amenities to those who need it instead of letting profit-driven corporations control the flow of necessities.

 @92NYS4X from Kansas answered…2yrs2Y

yes, but it should be slowly phased out and replaced with better social safety nets

 @8532KYJ from Georgia answered…2yrs2Y

Yes, but it should not be universal, it should only go to the impoverished, the working poor, and lower middle class families

 @92JXK3J from New York answered…2yrs2Y

 @92GWJXX from Georgia answered…2yrs2Y

Yes, everyone should receive an income to cover basic necessities including food and housing but they should also work.

  Deletedanswered…2yrs2Y

Yes for lower income brackets; but the wealthy should not qualify for this program, this would be a waste of resources.

  Deletedanswered…2yrs2Y

No, unless it is exclusively for families and/or owners of government bonds.

  Deletedanswered…2yrs2Y

Yes, everyone should receive an income to cover basic necessities including food and housing but they should still work.

 @929M4SLanswered…2yrs2Y

 @9276939 from Pennsylvania answered…2yrs2Y

Yes, but make it a requirement to be employed in order to apply, then subtract their U.B.I. from their normal paycheck.

 @923Z93G from Pennsylvania answered…2yrs2Y

 @ThomasJ476 from Georgia answered…2yrs2Y

Yes, everyone should receive an income to cover basic necessities including food and housing but only if they work.

Engagement

The historical activity of users engaging with this question.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Demographics

Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion

Loading data...