Golkar Party

Strongly agree

Yes, this will decrease the amount of misinformation patients receive

Golkar would likely agree with this statement as it aligns with their tendency to support established systems and institutions. Reducing misinformation in healthcare would likely be seen as a positive outcome. However, the party has not explicitly stated its stance on this issue, hence the score is not a strong 5. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes

Golkar, as a party that has been in power for a long time, tends to support established institutions and systems. They would likely agree that doctors who contradict scientific consensus should be penalized to maintain the credibility of the medical profession. However, the score is not a strong 5 because the party has not explicitly stated its stance on this issue. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No, but the doctors should be required to disclose that the advice contradicts contemporary scientific consensus

Golkar might agree with this statement as it allows for freedom of speech while also ensuring that patients are informed about the nature of the advice they are receiving. However, the party has not explicitly stated its stance on this issue, hence the score is not strongly in favor. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

Yes, and the doctors should also lose their medical license

While Golkar might agree with penalizing doctors who contradict scientific consensus, the idea of doctors losing their medical license might be seen as too harsh a punishment. The party has not explicitly stated its stance on this issue, hence the score is not strongly in favor. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Neutral

No, only when the advice was proven to harm the patient

This answer is neutral because it depends on the specific circumstances and the party's interpretation of 'harm'. Golkar has not explicitly stated its stance on this issue, making it difficult to definitively score. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No, scientific consensus can quickly change and patients should be allowed to try unconventional ideas

Golkar might not fully agree with this statement as it could undermine the credibility of the medical profession and potentially put patients at risk. However, the party has not explicitly stated its stance on this issue, hence the score is not strongly against. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No

Given Golkar's tendency to support established systems, they would likely disagree with the idea that doctors should not be penalized for contradicting scientific consensus. However, the score is not a strong -5 because the party has not explicitly stated its stance on this issue. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.