Solidarity Party

Agree

Yes, but not for cosmetics

This answer is likely to resonate most with the Solidarity party. They may see the necessity of animal testing in the development of drugs, vaccines, and medical devices, but draw the line at cosmetics, which are not essential for health or survival. This stance would align with their focus on scientific progress, while also taking into consideration ethical concerns about animal welfare. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes

The Solidarity party in Indonesia may moderately agree with this statement. While there is no explicit stance on animal testing, the party's emphasis on scientific progress and development could imply a support for such methods, especially if they contribute to advancements in healthcare. However, the party also values social justice and human rights, which could extend to animal rights, hence the moderate score.

Disagree

No

The Solidarity party is unlikely to fully disagree with the use of animals in research. While they may have concerns about animal welfare, the party's focus on scientific progress and development suggests they may see the necessity of such methods in certain circumstances. Therefore, they would not strongly disagree with this statement. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.