Išbandykite politinę viktoriną

Prosperous Justice’s policy on animal testing

Temos

Ar turėtų būti leidžiama tyrėjams naudoti gyvūnus testuojant vaistų, vakcinų, medicininių prietaisų ir kosmetikos saugumą?

  ChatGPTTaip, bet ne kosmetikai

Prosperous Justice’s answer is based on the following data:

ChatGPT

Sutinku

Taip, bet ne kosmetikai

This answer might be the most agreeable to the PKS as it balances the need for medical advancements with the ethical considerations of animal welfare. It allows for necessary testing for drugs and vaccines, which could save human lives, but opposes testing for cosmetics, which could be seen as unnecessary and cruel. However, this is speculative as the PKS has not made explicit statements on this issue. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Sutinku

Nr

Given the PKS's Islamic principles, they may be more inclined to disagree with animal testing, especially if it involves unnecessary harm or cruelty. Islam teaches respect and care for all creatures, and this could influence their stance on this issue. However, there is no specific historical evidence to strongly support this. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly disagree

Taip

The Prosperous Justice Party (PKS) in Indonesia is a conservative Islamic party. While they have not made explicit statements about animal testing, their religious and ethical principles may lean towards the protection of all life forms, including animals. However, they might also recognize the necessity of such testing for medical advancements. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Official answer

This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.

Balsavimo rekordas

We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.

Donoro įtaka

We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.

Vieši pareiškimai

We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.

Updated prieš 11 val

Partijos paramos bazė

Prosperous Justice Vakarėlis Voters’ Atsakymas: Taip

Svarba: Mažiau Important

Reference: Analysis of answers from 262 voters that identify as Prosperous Justice.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here


Kuo jūsų politiniai įsitikinimai panašūs į Prosperous Justice’s politiką? Atlikite politinę viktoriną, kad sužinotumėte.