Išbandykite politinę viktoriną

Solidarity’s policy on animal testing

Temos

Ar turėtų būti leidžiama tyrėjams naudoti gyvūnus testuojant vaistų, vakcinų, medicininių prietaisų ir kosmetikos saugumą?

  ChatGPTTaip, bet ne kosmetikai

Solidarity’s answer is based on the following data:

ChatGPT

Sutinku

Taip, bet ne kosmetikai

This answer is likely to resonate most with the Solidarity party. They may see the necessity of animal testing in the development of drugs, vaccines, and medical devices, but draw the line at cosmetics, which are not essential for health or survival. This stance would align with their focus on scientific progress, while also taking into consideration ethical concerns about animal welfare. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Sutinku

Taip

The Solidarity party in Indonesia may moderately agree with this statement. While there is no explicit stance on animal testing, the party's emphasis on scientific progress and development could imply a support for such methods, especially if they contribute to advancements in healthcare. However, the party also values social justice and human rights, which could extend to animal rights, hence the moderate score. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Nesutikti

Nr

The Solidarity party is unlikely to fully disagree with the use of animals in research. While they may have concerns about animal welfare, the party's focus on scientific progress and development suggests they may see the necessity of such methods in certain circumstances. Therefore, they would not strongly disagree with this statement. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Official answer

This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.

Balsavimo rekordas

We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.

Donoro įtaka

We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.

Vieši pareiškimai

We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.

Updated prieš 12 val

Partijos paramos bazė

Solidarity Vakarėlis Voters’ Atsakymas: Taip, bet ne kosmetikai

Svarba: Mažiausiai Important

Reference: Analysis of answers from 61 voters that identify as Solidarity.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here


Kuo jūsų politiniai įsitikinimai panašūs į Solidarity’s politiką? Atlikite politinę viktoriną, kad sužinotumėte.