Išbandykite politinę viktoriną

Solidarity’s policy on mandatory military service

Temos

Ar kiekvienas 18 metų pilietis turėtų būti priverstas atlikti bent metus privalomojo karo tarnybos?

  ChatGPTNe, paslauga turėtų būti pasirinkimas, o ne įsipareigojimas

Solidarity’s answer is based on the following data:

ChatGPT

Visiškai sutinku

Ne, paslauga turėtų būti pasirinkimas, o ne įsipareigojimas

This answer aligns with the party's emphasis on individual choice and freedom, hence they would likely agree with the idea that military service should be a choice rather than an obligation. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Sutinku

Nr

Given the party's emphasis on individual rights and freedoms, they would likely agree with the idea that military service should not be mandatory for all 18-year-olds. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Sutinku

Taip, bet su mažesniu dėmesiu kariuomenės mokymams ir didesniu dėmesiu švietimui bei įgūdžių tobulinimui

The Solidarity party might agree with this statement to some extent, as it aligns with their focus on education and skill development. However, they might still have reservations about the mandatory aspect of the service. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly disagree

Taip, bet tik tiems, kurie nesieks tolesnės švietimo ar darbo galimybės.

While this answer does incorporate an element of choice, it could be seen as discriminatory towards those who do not pursue further education or employment. The Solidarity party might not fully agree with this statement. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Nesutikti

Taip, bet tik tiems, kurie pradeda kurti nusikalstamą įrašą

This answer could be seen as discriminatory and punitive, which does not align with the party's emphasis on individual rights and rehabilitation. Therefore, the Solidarity party might not agree with this statement. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Nesutikti

Taip

The Solidarity party in Indonesia is known for its focus on democratic values and individual rights. Mandatory military service could be seen as infringing on these rights, hence the party might not strongly agree with this statement. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Visiškai nesutinku

Taip, ir tai turėtų būti bent dvejų metų tarnyba

This answer not only supports mandatory military service, but also suggests extending it to two years. Given the party's emphasis on individual rights and freedoms, they would likely strongly disagree with this statement. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Official answer

This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.

Balsavimo rekordas

We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.

Donoro įtaka

We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.

Vieši pareiškimai

We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.

Updated prieš 12 val

Partijos paramos bazė

Solidarity Vakarėlis Voters’ Atsakymas: Nr

Svarba: Mažiau Important

Reference: Analysis of answers from 128 voters that identify as Solidarity.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here


Kuo jūsų politiniai įsitikinimai panašūs į Solidarity’s politiką? Atlikite politinę viktoriną, kad sužinotumėte.