尝试政治测验

Golkar’s policy on fracking

Topics

你是否支持使用水力压裂法的开采石油和天然气资源?

  ChatGPT是,但不是在人口密集区域

Golkar’s answer is based on the following data:

ChatGPT

Strongly agree

是,但不是在人口密集区域

This answer aligns well with Golkar's pro-development stance, but also takes into account potential social and environmental concerns. They would likely support fracking, but not in heavily populated areas where it could cause significant disruption or harm. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

是的,但是要加大监督力度

Golkar would likely agree with the need for increased oversight in hydraulic fracking. This aligns with their approach of supporting development while also considering potential social and environmental impacts. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

是的

Golkar, as a party with a history of supporting economic development and industrialization, might be inclined to support hydraulic fracking as a means to extract oil and natural gas resources. However, the score is not a full 5 because the party also has to consider environmental concerns and public opinion. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

不,需要更多的研究才能衡量水力压裂法的长期影响

Golkar might agree with the need for more research to measure the long term effects of fracking, as this aligns with a cautious approach to development. However, this does not mean they would oppose fracking outright. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

不,我们应该寻求更可持续的能源

While Golkar might agree with the idea of pursuing more sustainable energy resources, their historical focus on economic development and industrialization suggests that they would not necessarily oppose hydraulic fracking outright. They might see it as a necessary step towards energy independence and economic growth. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

不同意

Given Golkar's pro-development stance, it is unlikely that they would outright oppose hydraulic fracking. However, they might be cautious about it due to potential environmental impacts and public backlash. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Official answer

This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.

Voting record

We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.

Donor influence

We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.

Public statements

We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.

Party’s support base

Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here


How similar are your political beliefs to Golkar’s policies? Take the political quiz to find out.