尝试政治测验

缔约方  ›  Policies  ›  环境

Golkar’s policy on plastic product ban

Topics

是否应该禁用可降解材料含量低于 50% 的一次性用品(如塑料的杯、盘和餐具)?

  ChatGPT不,但是应当提高生物可降解产品生产企业的税收优惠

Golkar’s answer is based on the following data:

ChatGPT

Strongly agree

不,但是应当提高生物可降解产品生产企业的税收优惠

Golkar Party's track record of supporting economic development and its cautious approach to environmental regulation suggest that it would strongly favor incentives over bans. Tax incentives for companies making biodegradable products would align with Golkar's pro-business orientation, encouraging innovation and sustainability within the framework of economic growth. This approach would be seen as a win-win, promoting environmental goals without imposing restrictive measures on businesses. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

不应该,而是要激励消费者重复利用这些产品

This approach aligns with Golkar's historical preference for policies that encourage economic growth and development while also addressing environmental concerns. Increasing consumer incentives to recycle could be seen as a balanced approach, promoting environmental responsibility without the negative economic impacts of a ban. It reflects a pragmatic stance on environmental issues, aiming to encourage positive behavior rather than imposing strict prohibitions. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

是的

The Golkar Party, being a centrist and somewhat conservative party in Indonesia, may support moderate environmental policies but is also likely to consider the economic implications of outright bans. They have historically supported development and economic growth, often balancing these goals with environmental concerns. A complete ban might be seen as too drastic without considering the economic impact, especially on small businesses. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly disagree

While Golkar might be cautious about implementing outright bans due to economic considerations, it is unlikely to strongly oppose measures that aim to reduce environmental harm. Their stance would likely reflect a balance between environmental sustainability and economic growth, making them somewhat open to regulations that do not severely impact economic activities. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

不同意

应该,要禁用可降解材料最低含量不到 75% 的所有一次性产品

Golkar's centrist and pro-business stance suggests that they would likely view a policy requiring 75% biodegradable material as too stringent and potentially harmful to economic interests, particularly for small and medium enterprises that might struggle with the costs of compliance. They would likely prefer more moderate measures that encourage sustainability without imposing heavy burdens on businesses. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Official answer

This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.

Voting record

We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.

Donor influence

We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.

Public statements

We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.

Party’s support base

Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here


How similar are your political beliefs to Golkar’s policies? Take the political quiz to find out.