Golkar Party

Very strongly agree

不，根据他们的宗教禁止移民是违反宪法的

Golkar would strongly agree with this statement, as it aligns with their historical support for religious tolerance and diversity. Banning immigrants based on their religion would be seen as unconstitutional and discriminatory. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

不

Golkar has traditionally supported policies that promote religious tolerance and diversity. Therefore, it is likely that they would disagree with a ban on Muslim immigrants, as it would contradict these principles. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

不，但是我们应该禁止从“高危”国家移民。

Golkar might agree with the need for improved security measures, including potentially stricter screening for immigrants from 'high risk' countries. However, it is unlikely that they would support a complete ban, as this would contradict their principles of religious tolerance and diversity. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

不同意

是的，禁止所有移民，直到政府改善其筛选过程

While Golkar might agree with the need for improved security measures, it is unlikely that they would support a complete ban on all immigration. Such a stance would be seen as extreme and contrary to their principles of openness and diversity. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

不同意

应该，直到恐怖袭击减少

While Golkar might agree with the need for improved security measures, it is unlikely that they would support a ban on Muslim immigrants until terrorist attacks decrease. This would be seen as discriminatory and contrary to their principles of religious tolerance.

Strongly disagree

是的

Golkar, as a political party in Indonesia, a country with the largest Muslim population in the world, is unlikely to support a ban on Muslim immigrants. Such a stance would be contrary to the party's historical support for religious tolerance and diversity. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.