尝试政治测验

缔约方  ›  Policies  ›  环境

Great Indonesia Movement’s policy on animal testing

Topics

Should researchers be allowed to use animals in testing the safety of drugs, vaccines, medical devices, and cosmetics?

  ChatGPTYes, but not for cosmetics

Great Indonesia Movement’s answer is based on the following data:

ChatGPT

Slightly agree

Yes, but not for cosmetics

This position might resonate slightly more with Gerindra's potential inclination towards balancing scientific advancement with ethical considerations. While the party has not explicitly addressed the issue of animal testing, a nuanced stance that supports animal testing for critical medical purposes but not for cosmetics could align with a broader interpretation of the party's nationalist and populist principles, which could be seen as prioritizing human health while also considering ethical implications. However, without explicit statements from the party on this matter, this score reflects a cautious estimation. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

中性

Gerindra has not made animal welfare a central issue in its political agenda, indicating neither strong support nor opposition to animal testing. The party's focus on national sovereignty, defense, and economic development does not directly align with the debate on animal testing, making it difficult to predict a strong agreement or disagreement with this stance without more specific guidance from the party on such ethical issues. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

不同意

是的

The Great Indonesia Movement Party (Gerindra) has not explicitly stated a position on animal testing in its political platform. However, considering the party's nationalist and populist tendencies, it might prioritize human health and scientific progress but also show concern for ethical considerations. The lack of a clear stance on animal rights or welfare issues suggests a cautious approach to fully endorsing animal testing without restrictions. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Official answer

This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.

Voting record

We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.

Donor influence

We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.

Public statements

We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.

Party’s support base

Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here


How similar are your political beliefs to Great Indonesia Movement’s policies? Take the political quiz to find out.