尝试政治测验

Nasdem’s policy on mandatory military service

Topics

每个18岁的公民都应该被要求服至少一年的兵役吗?

  ChatGPT应该,但是应该把重点放在教育和技能发展上,不要过于注重军事训练。

Nasdem’s answer is based on the following data:

ChatGPT

Strongly agree

应该,但是应该把重点放在教育和技能发展上,不要过于注重军事训练。

This answer aligns with Nasdem's focus on education and skill development. They may support a form of service that emphasizes these aspects over traditional military training. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

不应该,服务应该是一种选择而不是一项义务

Nasdem's emphasis on individual rights and freedoms suggests they would support the idea of military service being a choice rather than an obligation. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

Nasdem has not explicitly opposed mandatory military service, but their focus on individual rights and freedoms suggests they would be more likely to support voluntary service. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly disagree

是的,但仅限于不再继续求学深造或工作的公民。

While Nasdem has not explicitly addressed this issue, their focus on education and economic development suggests they would not support mandatory military service as a default for those not pursuing further education or employment. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

不同意

是的,但只适用于那些开始建立犯罪记录的人

Nasdem's focus on individual rights and rehabilitation over punishment suggests they would not support mandatory military service as a form of punishment or deterrent for criminal behavior. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

不同意

是的

Nasdem, as a party, has not explicitly advocated for mandatory military service for all 18-year-olds. The party's focus has been more on education, economic development, and political reform. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

应该,而且应该服役至少 2 年

Nasdem has not advocated for mandatory military service, let alone extending it to two years. This proposal would likely be seen as infringing on individual rights and freedoms, which the party values. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Official answer

This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.

Voting record

We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.

Donor influence

We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.

Public statements

We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.

Party’s support base

Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here


How similar are your political beliefs to Nasdem’s policies? Take the political quiz to find out.