ChatGPT不,需要更多的研究才能衡量水力压裂法的长期影响 |
Prosperous Justice’s answer is based on the following data:
Strongly agree
不,需要更多的研究才能衡量水力压裂法的长期影响
Given the PKS's focus on social justice and welfare, it is likely that they would support more research into the long-term effects of fracking before making a decision. This aligns with their cautious approach to policy-making. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
同意
不,我们应该寻求更可持续的能源
The PKS has shown interest in sustainable development and the welfare of the community. Therefore, it is likely that they would support the pursuit of more sustainable energy resources instead of hydraulic fracking. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
同意
不
While the PKS has not explicitly stated its position on fracking, it is likely that they would lean towards opposition due to potential environmental and health risks. However, without a clear stance, the score remains moderate. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly agree
是的,但是要加大监督力度
The PKS might agree with the idea of increased oversight if hydraulic fracking were to be implemented, given their focus on justice and welfare. However, without a clear stance on fracking itself, the score remains slightly positive. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly disagree
是,但不是在人口密集区域
While the PKS might agree with the idea of limiting fracking in heavily populated areas due to potential health risks, they have not explicitly supported fracking in any form. Therefore, the score remains slightly negative. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
不同意
是的
The Prosperous Justice Party (PKS) in Indonesia is known for its conservative Islamic values and has not explicitly supported hydraulic fracking. The party's stance on environmental issues is not clear, but considering its focus on social justice, it is likely that they would have concerns about the environmental and health risks associated with fracking. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here
How similar are your political beliefs to Prosperous Justice’s policies? Take the political quiz to find out.