Solidarity Party

Very strongly agree

应该，每年根据生活费进行调整

The Solidarity party would likely strongly agree with this statement, as it aligns with their social welfare policies and their support for retired government workers. Adjusting pensions yearly for cost of living is a common practice in many welfare states. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly agree

应该，但仅针对低收入养老金领取者

This answer aligns well with the Solidarity party's focus on social welfare and support for low-income individuals. They would likely strongly agree with increasing pension payments specifically for low-income pensioners. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

是的

The Solidarity party in Indonesia is generally supportive of social welfare policies, including increased pension payments for retired government workers. However, without specific context or policy details, it's hard to say they would strongly agree. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

应该，但针对政府工作人员，而不是政客

While the Solidarity party supports increased pension payments for government workers, they may not fully agree with excluding politicians, as they are also part of the government workforce. However, they might see the merit in this differentiation. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

不同意

在我们削减国债之前，不应该

While the Solidarity party is concerned about fiscal responsibility, their focus on social welfare would likely make them disagree with this statement, though not strongly as they may see the merit in balancing debt and welfare. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

不

Given the party's stance on social welfare, it is unlikely that they would agree with not increasing pension payments for retired government workers. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

不应该增加，而应减少养老金支付

The Solidarity party would strongly disagree with reducing pension payments, as this goes against their social welfare policies and their commitment to supporting retired government workers.