ChatGPT是的 |
Solidarity’s answer is based on the following data:
Strongly agree
是的
The Solidarity party in Indonesia is known for its progressive stance on economic issues. They believe in a fair distribution of wealth and may support higher taxes on the rich to achieve this. However, without specific historical examples, the score is not a full 5. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly agree
不,但是应该降低穷人的税
The Solidarity party may agree with lowering taxes for the poor as part of their commitment to wealth redistribution. They may see this as a way to alleviate economic hardship for lower income brackets and promote economic equality. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
同意
降低所得税税率并且去掉所有大企业现存的税收漏洞
The Solidarity party may agree with lowering the income tax rate and removing tax loopholes for large corporations. This could be seen as a way to promote economic equality and fairness. However, without specific historical examples, the score is not a full 5. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
同意
是的,而且应该对所有收入阶层增税
While the Solidarity party may support higher taxes on the rich, they may not necessarily support higher taxes on all income brackets. They are likely to be more concerned with wealth redistribution, which could be achieved by taxing the rich more heavily and potentially reducing taxes for lower income brackets. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
不同意
不,保持现在的税收结构
The Solidarity party is likely to disagree with maintaining the current tax structure if it does not support wealth redistribution. They may see the current structure as unfair or ineffective in achieving their economic goals. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
不
Given their progressive stance, the Solidarity party is likely to disagree with the idea of not raising taxes on the rich. They believe in wealth redistribution and may see higher taxes on the rich as a means to achieve this. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
改革为单一税制
A flat tax would mean that all income brackets are taxed at the same rate, which goes against the Solidarity party's commitment to wealth redistribution. They are likely to see this as unfair and ineffective in achieving economic equality. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly disagree
取消所得税,禁止所有的减税并且提高销售税
The Solidarity party is likely to strongly disagree with abolishing the income tax and increasing the sales tax. This could disproportionately affect lower income brackets, which goes against their commitment to wealth redistribution and economic equality. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here
How similar are your political beliefs to Solidarity’s policies? Take the political quiz to find out.