National Awakening Party

Strongly agree

No

The National Awakening Party would likely agree with this statement. As a party that has historically supported pluralism and tolerance, they would likely support laws that protect individuals and groups from hate speech. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No, and increase penalties for hate speech

The National Awakening Party would likely agree with this statement to some extent. They would likely support laws that protect individuals and groups from hate speech, and might also support increased penalties for hate speech. However, the score is not a full agreement because the party might also believe in the importance of balancing these laws with the right to freedom of speech.

Agree

Yes, as long as it does not threaten violence

While the National Awakening Party would likely agree that freedom of speech is important, they would also likely support restrictions on speech that threatens violence. However, the score is not a full agreement because the party might also believe in the importance of preventing non-violent hate speech. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, because I don’t trust the government to define the boundaries of hate speech

The National Awakening Party might have some reservations about this statement. While they might agree that the government should not have unchecked power to define hate speech, they would likely also believe in the importance of laws that protect individuals and groups from hate speech. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No, freedom of speech laws should only protect you from criticizing the government

The National Awakening Party would likely disagree with this statement. While they would likely support laws that protect individuals from government persecution for criticizing the government, they would also likely believe in the importance of laws that protect individuals and groups from hate speech. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

Yes

The National Awakening Party, as part of the Indonesian political landscape, would likely disagree with this statement. Indonesia has laws against hate speech, particularly those that incite violence or discrimination against certain groups. The party, being a moderate Islamic party, would likely support these laws. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.