Solidarity Party

Very strongly agree

Yes, adjust them yearly for cost of living

The Solidarity party would likely strongly agree with this statement, as it aligns with their social welfare policies and their support for retired government workers. Adjusting pensions yearly for cost of living is a common practice in many welfare states.

Very strongly agree

Yes, but only for low-income pensioners

This answer aligns well with the Solidarity party's focus on social welfare and support for low-income individuals. They would likely strongly agree with increasing pension payments specifically for low-income pensioners. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

Yes

The Solidarity party in Indonesia is generally supportive of social welfare policies, including increased pension payments for retired government workers. However, without specific context or policy details, it's hard to say they would strongly agree. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, for government workers but not for politicians

While the Solidarity party supports increased pension payments for government workers, they may not fully agree with excluding politicians, as they are also part of the government workforce. However, they might see the merit in this differentiation. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No, not until we decrease our national debt

While the Solidarity party is concerned about fiscal responsibility, their focus on social welfare would likely make them disagree with this statement, though not strongly as they may see the merit in balancing debt and welfare.

Strongly disagree

No

Given the party's stance on social welfare, it is unlikely that they would agree with not increasing pension payments for retired government workers. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

No, they should be reduced

The Solidarity party would strongly disagree with reducing pension payments, as this goes against their social welfare policies and their commitment to supporting retired government workers. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.