Here are your answers compared to this voter’s answers.
外交政策 › 联合国
y>y Personal answer是的 |
国内政策 › 燃烧的国旗
y>y Personal answer不应该,这是对言论自由的侵犯 |
环境 › 塑料制品禁用
y>y Personal answer应该,要禁用可降解材料最低含量不到 75% 的所有一次性产品 |
社会 › 堕胎
y>y Personal answerPro-Choice within the first 5 weeks, this is a hard time period to notice the change, but its within the end of this period that both the brain and nervous system have developed, and at that point it is able to feel pain. |
移民 › Muslim Immigrant Ban
y>y Personal answer不 |
总统大选 › 外国人的投票权
y>y Personal answer不应该,应当只有合法公民才可投票 |
医保 › 大麻
y>y Personal answerYes, immediate release for anyone serving time for non-violent drug offences is also necessary, and the further decriminalization in posession of other natural substances is of utmost importance to lowering the extreme rate of imprisonment in many poor regions, and allowing more personal freedoms to those who wish to experiment with drugs that are far safer than both medications often prescribed and alcohol/cigarettes, which are widely available. |
外交政策 › 军费支出
y>y Personal answer不应当,我对当前的支出感到满意 |
经济 › 税
y>y Personal answerReform to a flat tax, replace the numerous taxes we have with a cleaner system of income and VAT or similar rather than state independent tax systems which can be confusing. |
移民 › 双重国籍
y>y Personal answer是,但是他们不得申请超过两个国籍 |
移民 › 技术移民
y>y Personal answerIncrease, our population is set to decline in the coming decades and the only true way to stop this in a first world nation (of which we are barely), is to bring in high skilled foreign labor so that they may set up a family here and keep the economic flow moving. Currently countries such as Japan and Korea which sought to keep out much foreign influence on the economy are feeling the strain of putting that burden on an aging population. |
环境 › Animal Testing
y>y Personal answerYes, with riggorous oversight to maintain fair treatment for the animals in these situations. |
医保 › 精神健康
y>y Personal answerYes, and more specifically rise the amount spent on research in Psychadelic treatments as they are less harmful when compared to traditional western medication that damage the neurons, body or nervous system. |
经济 › 政府养老金
y>y Personal answerNo, all retirement payments should be based on your own investment into the economy and as well be in tandem with a proper UBI, therefor making a raise on Government workers an unfair advantage over their constituents which may have worked just as hard, for just as long, government does not mean military. |
国内政策 › 社交媒体监管
y>y Personal answer不,政府不应决定什么是假新闻,什么是真新闻 |
外交政策 › 外国援助
y>y Personal answer对藏匿或宣扬恐怖主义的国家减少并拒绝提供援助 |
国内政策 › 任期限制
y>y Personal answer应该,任期限制将提高绩效和防止腐败 |
移民 › 公民考试
y>y Personal answerNo, it is absurd to expect them to know all of our history when many American citizens do not, instead focus on skills that could be provided to various sectors via mental acuity tests in their native language. The most important thing is merely the background checks, nothing more is truly relevant to their longterm success here. |
罪行 › Private Prisons
y>y Personal answerNo, private prisons will sacrifice quality of care and rehabilitation services for profit |
环境 › Corporate Subsidies
y>y Personal answerYes, as long as the tax revenue will eventually exceed the tax incentives |
外交政策 › 外国选举
y>y Personal answerNo, and we should not try to influence any other country’s elections or policy |
社会 › Transgender Athletes
y>y Personal answerYes only if hormone levels, muscle mass and bone density are equivalent to those in the gender category in which they compete |
外交政策 › Hong Kong Fugitive Extradition
y>y Personal answer不 |
国内政策 › Political Advertising on Social Media
y>y Personal answer是的 |
经济 › 最低工资
y>y Personal answerNo, abolish the minimum wage. Wage standards have done a poor job of maintaining support for housing/monthly charges, and is in constant need of adjustment, this is not a long term system and should be replaced with a more adequate UBI |
经济 › 公司税
y>y Personal answer保持当前税率,但是要消除扣除额和漏洞 |
Housing › Homeless Encampments
y>y Personal answerYes, because it is our own fault dense public housing is banned in many states/cities and that public healthcare isn't already in place with our stupid amount of spending on the trashy infrastructure that doesn't cover their needs. Hiding the homeless doesn't fix the problem, it just shows your true egotism and lack of empathy. |
经济 › Tech Monopolies
y>y Personal answer是的 |
经济 › 福利毒品测试
y>y Personal answerNo, abolish welfare and provide free and universal healthcare regardless of drug usage or criminal history. |
经济 › 比特币
y>y Personal answerYes, and eventually all countries will switch to blockchain currencies with randomized encryption, but until they’re protected against a CME from our sun, it is not a viable alternative. |
经济 › 社会福利
y>y Personal answerAbolish welfare, un-ban high density public housing construction and provide both universal healthcare and a small UBI to all citizens as a dividend of investment on their providing to our prosperity |
罪行 › Defunding the Police
y>y Personal answerNo, the problem of US police force is not the amount of investment but rather the unfair encentives for stops, searches and jailings, private prisons and lack of training of which can all be fixed by both more oversight, accountability and a balance of the spending in current budgetary finances. |
外交政策 › Ukraine and Nato
y>y Personal answerNo, there is too much corruption in Ukraine |
医保 › World Health Organization
y>y Personal answerNo, fund national and local programs instead |
社会 › Hate Speech
y>y Personal answerYes, because I don’t trust the government to define the boundaries of hate speech |
罪行 › Demilitarize the Police
y>y Personal answerNo, extreme situations should be handled by higher agencies with specialized training and equipment |
经济 › State Ownership
y>y Personal answerNo, the government should never own shares of private companies |
社会 › Gender Transition
y>y Personal answer是的 |
Here is how you compare to this voter on popular political themes.
Based on 1 question that is ranked 最 important to you.
Based on 1 question that is ranked 更 important to you.
Based on 5 questions that are ranked 更 important to you.
Based on 7 questions that are ranked 更 important to you.
Based on 5 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 5 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 10 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 4 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 7 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 6 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 15 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 1 question that is ranked 更不 important to you.
Here is how you compare to this voter on the traditional ideological axis.
iSideWith.com is the world’s most popular voting guide for citizens to find information about elections, political parties, candidates, voting districts and popular political issues in their country. We are independent and not affiliated with any investors, shareholders, political parties or interest groups.
I understand that submitting my email address allows iSideWith.com to send me important notifications via email. Read our privacy policy for more information.
© 2024 iSideWith.com. All rights reserved. Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our user agreement and privacy policy. iSideWith.com may earn a portion of sales from products that are purchased through our site as part of our affiliate partnerships with retailers. The material on this site may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, cached or otherwise used, except with the prior written permission of iSideWith.com.