Here are your answers compared to this voter’s answers.
移民 › 遣送移民罪犯出境
MN>MN Personal answerYes, for if immigrants don't have a residence here and no if they're resident here. |
外交政策 › 联合国
MN>MN Personal answer是的 |
环境 › 塑料制品禁用
MN>MN Personal answer不应该,而是要激励消费者重复利用这些产品 |
移民 › Muslim Immigrant Ban
MN>MN Personal answer应该,直到恐怖袭击减少 |
医保 › 安全港
MN>MN Personal answer应该,这对于降低用药过量死亡率是必要的 |
国内政策 › 燃烧的国旗
MN>MN Personal answer不应该,我不会尊敬去这么做的人,但他们应该有这么做的权利 |
总统大选 › 外国人的投票权
MN>MN Personal answer是的,但是只有在他们在此国家生活5年后 |
外交政策 › 军费支出
MN>MN Personal answer减少 |
移民 › 双重国籍
MN>MN Personal answer是的 |
经济 › 税
MN>MN Personal answer不,但是应该降低穷人的税 |
罪行 › 监狱过度拥挤
MN>MN Personal answerNo, they can't be released from jail without evidence of why they have to be released, and once they are in jail, they're criminals. |
总统大选 › 候选人透明度
MN>MN Personal answer不,如果他们这样做了我会更加尊敬但是不应该要求他们做 |
环境 › Animal Testing
MN>MN Personal answer不 |
外交政策 › 外国援助
MN>MN Personal answer增长 |
国内政策 › 任期限制
MN>MN Personal answer是的 |
罪行 › Private Prisons
MN>MN Personal answer不 |
社会 › Transgender Athletes
MN>MN Personal answer是的 |
环境 › Corporate Subsidies
MN>MN Personal answerYes, as long as the local environment is not compromised |
国内政策 › Political Advertising on Social Media
MN>MN Personal answer不 |
经济 › 公司税
MN>MN Personal answer保持当前税率,但是要消除扣除额和漏洞 |
Housing › Homeless Encampments
MN>MN Personal answerNo, because it would be disturbing and not security safe enough. |
经济 › Tech Monopolies
MN>MN Personal answer不 |
罪行 › Defunding the Police
MN>MN Personal answerNo, increase funding and training for police departments in higher crime rate communities |
医保 › World Health Organization
MN>MN Personal answer是的 |
社会 › Hate Speech
MN>MN Personal answerNo, freedom of speech laws should only protect you from criticizing the government |
罪行 › Demilitarize the Police
MN>MN Personal answer不 |
社会 › Gender Transition
MN>MN Personal answer不 |
经济 › State Ownership
MN>MN Personal answerNo, the government should never own shares of private companies |
Here is how you compare to this voter on popular political themes.
Based on 1 question that is ranked 最 important to you.
Based on 1 question that is ranked 更 important to you.
Based on 7 questions that are ranked 更 important to you.
Based on 5 questions that are ranked 更 important to you.
Based on 5 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 5 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 10 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 4 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 6 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 6 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 14 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 1 question that is ranked 更不 important to you.
Here is how you compare to this voter on the traditional ideological axis.
iSideWith.com is the world’s most popular voting guide for citizens to find information about elections, political parties, candidates, voting districts and popular political issues in their country. We are independent and not affiliated with any investors, shareholders, political parties or interest groups.
I understand that submitting my email address allows iSideWith.com to send me important notifications via email. Read our privacy policy for more information.
© 2024 iSideWith.com. All rights reserved. Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our user agreement and privacy policy. iSideWith.com may earn a portion of sales from products that are purchased through our site as part of our affiliate partnerships with retailers. The material on this site may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, cached or otherwise used, except with the prior written permission of iSideWith.com.