Here are your answers compared to this voter’s answers.
Transportation › Public Transportation
T>T Personal answerYes |
Immigration › Deporting Criminal Immigrants
T>T Personal answerYes, but after they have finished serving their sentence |
Elections › Criminal Politicians
T>T Personal answerYes |
Foreign Policy › United Nations
T>T Personal answerYes |
Social › Death Penalty
T>T Personal answerYes, but only for horrific crimes with undeniable evidence |
Domestic Policy › Flag Burning
T>T Personal answerNo |
the Environment › Plastic Product Ban
T>T Personal answerNo |
Social › Abortion
T>T Personal answerPro-life; But the most controversial decisions in our society, including abortion, should be left for the people of each state to regulate as they see fit. |
Immigration › Muslim Immigrant Ban
T>T Personal answerNo, but we should ban immigrants from “high risk” countries |
Healthcare › Safe Haven
T>T Personal answerYes, but only if accompanied by treatment and rehabilitation |
Elections › Right of Foreigners to Vote
T>T Personal answerNo |
Science › Nuclear Energy
T>T Personal answerYes |
Domestic Policy › Armed Teachers
T>T Personal answerYes |
Healthcare › Marijuana
T>T Personal answerI don’t care |
the Economy › Government Spending
T>T Personal answerYes |
Domestic Policy › Drug Policy
T>T Personal answerIf someone wants to waste their life on drugs, that is their prerogative. Although I believe it is morally wrong to abusively consume any substance, I am indifferent to whether it is legally permitted or not. Legislating against it will not prevent controlled substances from being abused and can increase one's susceptibility by bringing abusers into contact with more aggressive dealers in prison. At the same time, there are those that will not consider the consequences of abusive consumption if not confronted with criminal sentences. Substances that have legitimate medicinal benefit can be permitted. But at a minimum, drug use should be heavily regulated and consumption while operating machinery, driving a motor vehicle, or participating in other criminal activity should be considered attempted assault with a deadly weapon and prosecuted harshly. Those caught selling outside authorized channels or with unapproved substances or of insufficient quality should be subjected to severe criminal and civil liabilities. |
Social › LGBT Adoption Rights
T>T Personal answerNo |
the Economy › Taxes
T>T Personal answerAbolish the income tax, disallow all deductions and increase the sales tax |
Social › Niqāb
T>T Personal answerYes |
Domestic Policy › Whistleblower Protection
T>T Personal answerYes |
Immigration › Dual Citizenship
T>T Personal answerYes, unless they have committed a crime |
Crime › Drug Trafficking Penalties
T>T Personal answerNo |
Foreign Policy › Mandatory Military Service
T>T Personal answerOne or two years service, yes, but other types of service should be allowed. Fire, paramedic, and teaching should also be allowed as acceptable forms of service. |
Crime › Criminal Voting Rights
T>T Personal answerYes, but only after completing their sentences and parole/probation |
Elections › Campaign Finance
T>T Personal answerYes |
Crime › Prison Overcrowding
T>T Personal answerThey should be permitted to be, on the order of a judge, assuming house arrest and community service for the duration of their sentences. It should not be an across the board mandate or expectation. |
Healthcare › Single-Payer Healthcare
T>T Personal answerNo, the government should not be involved in healthcare |
Immigration › Skilled Immigrants
T>T Personal answerIncrease |
Elections › Candidate Transparency
T>T Personal answerNo |
the Environment › Animal Testing
T>T Personal answerYes |
Healthcare › Mental Health
T>T Personal answerNo, incentivize private companies to address this issue instead |
Social › Euthanasia
T>T Personal answerNo, but they should be allowed to refuse artificial life support |
the Economy › Government Pensions
T>T Personal answerNo |
Social › Gay Marriage
T>T Personal answerTheologically, I believe marriage can only be between a man and woman. However, the people, by way of their representatives, can determine how society will interact with the institution; it will not change it fundamentally. Given such, I would vote that it should be recognized only between a man and woman. Regardless of it's legal status, the LGBT community should be treated with respect and dignity and should not be discriminated against in regards to employment, housing or other basic rights and services. Those who have a genuine disagreement with the same sex marriage, especially due to religious reasons, should not be forced to support it. |
Domestic Policy › Social Media Regulation
T>T Personal answerNo |
Social › Gender Workplace Diversity
T>T Personal answerNo, board members should be the most qualified regardless of gender |
Elections › Minimum Voting Age
T>T Personal answerYes, any citizen that pays taxes should be allowed to vote |
Domestic Policy › Term Limits
T>T Personal answerYes |
the Environment › Fracking
T>T Personal answerYes |
Immigration › Citizenship Test
T>T Personal answerYes, and states should increase the requirement for citizens to learn and study our history, government, and geography in schools and universities. |
Crime › Private Prisons
T>T Personal answerNo |
the Economy › Economic Stimulus
T>T Personal answerNo, recession is a natural cycle that purges excess |
the Environment › Corporate Subsidies
T>T Personal answerYes |
Social › Transgender Athletes
T>T Personal answerThis should not be a political question because it is outside the domain of government. Let sporting organizations decide this question for themselves. |
Foreign Policy › Foreign Elections
T>T Personal answerNo |
Foreign Policy › Hong Kong Fugitive Extradition
T>T Personal answerNo |
the Economy › Universal Basic Income
T>T Personal answerNo, this will encourage people not to work and harm economic growth |
Domestic Policy › Political Advertising on Social Media
T>T Personal answerNo |
the Economy › Domestic Jobs
T>T Personal answerYes |
the Economy › Corporate Tax
T>T Personal answerBalance the budget, then we can talk about whether and how to finance tax cuts. |
the Economy › Minimum Wage
T>T Personal answerNo, and eliminate all wage standards |
the Economy › Offshore Banking
T>T Personal answerYes |
Housing › Homeless Encampments
T>T Personal answerIndividuals have a right to traverse and loiter on public property, regardless of whether they are homeless or not, so long as they are not damaging property or otherwise depriving the rest of the public of their ability to enjoy those spaces safely. Large groups of people creating "pop-up villages" within a space not designed and designated for the purpose create a hazard for those living there, deprive the rest of the general public of its use of the property, and can create an undue and unintended burden on surrounding infrastructure. I support the rights of individuals to traverse and loiter as well as the rights of local governments to protect public assets and ensure public safety. |
the Economy › Tech Monopolies
T>T Personal answerNo |
the Economy › Welfare Drug Testing
T>T Personal answerYes |
the Economy › Bitcoin
T>T Personal answerYes |
the Economy › Welfare
T>T Personal answerMore |
Crime › Defunding the Police
T>T Personal answerNo |
Healthcare › World Health Organization
T>T Personal answerYes, but only in an amount sufficient to acquire "soft power". Most of our policy making should reside at the state and local levels. |
Social › Hate Speech
T>T Personal answerYes, because I don’t trust the government to define the boundaries of hate speech |
Crime › Demilitarize the Police
T>T Personal answerYes, but with strict training on how and when to use the equipment |
Here is how you compare to this voter on popular political themes.
Based on 1 question that is ranked most important to you.
Based on 1 question that is ranked more important to you.
Based on 5 questions that are ranked more important to you.
Based on 7 questions that are ranked more important to you.
Based on 5 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 5 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 9 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 4 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 4 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 6 questions that are ranked less important to you.
Based on 13 questions that are ranked less important to you.
Based on 1 question that is ranked less important to you.
Here is how you compare to this voter on the traditional ideological axis.
iSideWith.com is the world’s most popular voting guide for citizens to find information about elections, political parties, candidates, voting districts and popular political issues in their country. We are independent and not affiliated with any investors, shareholders, political parties or interest groups.
I understand that submitting my email address allows iSideWith.com to send me important notifications via email. Read our privacy policy for more information.
© 2024 iSideWith.com. All rights reserved. Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our user agreement and privacy policy. iSideWith.com may earn a portion of sales from products that are purchased through our site as part of our affiliate partnerships with retailers. The material on this site may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, cached or otherwise used, except with the prior written permission of iSideWith.com.